RESEARCH PAPER
Impact of one-step functional impressions with centric occlusion registration
on the number of adjustments applied to removable restorations
More details
Hide details
1
Poradnia Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Stomatologii Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
w Katowicach
3
Zakład Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Wydział Nauk Medycznych w Zabrzu,
Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
Submission date: 2024-11-26
Final revision date: 2025-02-24
Acceptance date: 2025-06-08
Publication date: 2025-06-15
Corresponding author
Miłosz Bichalski
Poradnia Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Stomatologii Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
w Katowicach
Prosthodontics 2025;75(2):105-110
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Due to progress in medical
care the mean longevity increases, as reflected
by statistical data. Between 2021 and 2022, life
expectancy for men and women increased by
one year and 0.6 years, respectively. This fact is
reflected in the decreasing number of retained
teeth in the population. Unfortunately, due to the
limited number of prosthetic services provided by
the National Health Fund, the most common form
of treatment is a removable prosthetic restoration.
Aim of the study:
To compare the number of
adjustments made to removable dentures following
their delivery to the patient relative to the number
of manufacturing stages. Comarisons were made
between traditional therapeutic approach, which divides the functional impression and centric
occlusion registration stages into two visits, and
a situation in which these stages are carried out
in a single visit.
Material and methods:
In all, the medical
records of 376 patients were analysed. The
medical records of 231 patients treated at the
Prosthodontics Clinic of the SUM University
Dental Centre were included in the study. The
inclusion criterion was the presence of the
functional impression stage.
Results:
The frequency of functional
impressions carried out with centric occlusion
registration during a single visit was compared
with the division of both procedures into two
separate appointments. The number of corrections
made to restorations in patients with one-step
and two-step procedures was also analysed. The
results show that the functional impression and
registration of the occlusion were performed
significantly more often in two separate visits
and that the percentage of patients requiring
correction was lower in this case.
Conclusions:
For both aspects, a difference
was found between performing both procedures
simultaneously and splitting them into two
separate sessions.