REVIEW PAPER
Impact of dental prosthetic restorations on diagnostic radiology
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Stomatologii, Centrum Medyczne Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego Sp. z o.o., Polska
2
Zakład Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Stomatologii,
Centrum Medyczne Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego Sp. z oo, Polska
Submission date: 2025-03-16
Final revision date: 2025-03-24
Acceptance date: 2025-09-18
Publication date: 2025-09-18
Corresponding author
Natalia Prusik
Zakład Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Stomatologii, Centrum Medyczne Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego Sp. z o.o., Stanisława Binieckiego 6, 02-097, Warszawa, Polska
Prosthodontics 2025;75(3):255-265
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Some metal alloy-based prosthetic and dental
materials, such as dentures, crowns, bridges,
orthodontic appliances and implants, as well as
separated endodontic instruments present in the
patient’s oral cavity, present absolute or relative
contraindications for diagnostic radiology
(magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray
diagnostics, including computed tomography).
The aim of this study is to focus on prosthetic
restorations that may cause artifacts, damage
dentures, or threaten patients’ health during
diagnostic imaging, and to discuss safe solutions.
Ferromagnetic materials, e.g. nickel, cobalt and
chromium, often cause flashes and shadows in the
image, and are susceptible to damage, deformation
or translocation. Prosthetic restorations made of
bioceramics, titanium, zirconium, gold, aluminum
and polymers are considered safe in diagnostic
radiology. Veneering porcelain on a metal
framework is a means to obtain biocompatible
and durable prosthetic materials that do not
interfere with radiological imaging. Dentists,
aware of the difficulties in diagnostic radiology
caused by prosthetic restorations, can increase
patient safety and reduce imaging artifacts, thus
improving diagnostic reliability.