REVIEW PAPER
Techniques of cleansing temporary cements remnants from dentines surface and the influence of temporary cements residues on the bond strength of composite cements – review of literature
1
Medical University of Lodz
Prosthodontics 2014;64(4):270-278
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES (63)
1.
Richardson D., Tao L., Pashley D.H.: Dentinpermeability: effects of crown preparation. Int. J. Prosthodont., 199, 4, 3, 219-225.
2.
Goldman M., Laosonthorn P., White R.R.: Microleakage – full crowns and the dental pulp. J. Endod., 1992, 18, 10, 473-475.
3.
Kim S.: Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in health and inflammation. J. Endod., 1990, 16, 2, 48-53.
4.
Baldissara P., Comin G., Martone F., Scotti R.: Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1998, 80, 4, 417-422.
5.
Rego M.R.1., Santiago L.C.: Retention of provisional crowns cemented with eight temporary cements: comparative study. J. Appl. Oral Sci., 2004, 12, 3, 209-212.
6.
Ribeiro J.C.V., Silva M.M., Fernandes C.A.O.: Influence of temporary cements on the bondstrength of resinous materials to the dental substrate. RGO – Rev. Gaucha Odontol., 2012, 60, 1, 91-98.
7.
Chaiyabutr Y., Kois J.C.: The Effects of Tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bondstrength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper. Dent., 2008, 33, 5, 556-563.
8.
Lepe X., Bales D.J., Johnson G.H.: Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from twomaterials with the use of four temporary cements. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1999, 81, 4, 469-475.
9.
Majewski S.W., Pryliński M.: Materiały i technologie współczesnej protetyki stomatologicznej. Lublin 2013.
10.
Markowitz K., Moynihan M., Liu M., Kim S.: Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1992, 73, 6, 729-737.
11.
Gegauff A.G., Rosenstiel S.F.: Effect of provisional luting agents on provisional resin additions. Quintessence Int., 1987, 18, 12, 841-845.
12.
Abo-Hamar S.E., Federlin M., Hiller K.A., Friedl K.H., Schmalz G.: Effect of temporarycements on the bondstrength of ceramic luted to dentin. Dent. Mater., 2005 Sep;21, 9, 794-803.
13.
Millstein P.L., Nathanson D.: Effects of temporary cementation on permanent cement retention to composite resin cores. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1992, 67, 6, 856-859.
14.
Rosentiel S.F., Gegauff A.G.: Effect of provisional cementing agents on provisional resins. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1988, 59, 1, 29-33.
15.
Taira J., Ikemoto T., Yoneya T., Hagi A., Murakami A., Makino K.: Essential oil phenyl propanoids. Useful as OH scavengers?, Free Radic. Res. Commun., 1992, 16, 3, 197-204.
16.
Marshall S.J., Marshall G.W. Jr, Harcourt J.K.: The influence of various cavity bases onthe micro-hardness of composites. Aust. Dent. J., 1982, 27, 5, 291-295.
17.
Fonseca R.B., Marcondes Dietschi L.R., Quagliatto P.S., Soares C.J.: Influence of provisionalcements on ultimate bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2005, 7, 3, 225-223.
18.
Paige H., Hirch S.M., Gelb M.N.: Effects of temporary cements on crown-to-compositeresin core bond strength. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1986, 55, 1, 49-52.
19.
Civjan S., Huget E.F., de Simon L.B.: Compatibility of resin composites with varnishes, iners, and bases [abstract 27]. J. Dent. Res., 1973, 52, 65.
20.
Lingard G.L., Davies E.H., Von Fraunhofe J.A.: The interaction between materials and composite resin restorative materials. J. Oral Rehabil., 1981, 8, 2, 121-129.
21.
Mayer T., Pioch T., Duschner H., Staehle H.J.: Dentinal adhesion and histomorphologyof two dentinal bonding agents under the influence of eugenol. Quintessence Int., 1997, 28, 1, 57-62.
22.
Terata R.: Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of a temporarycement – study on removal of temporary cement. Dent. Mater. J., 1993, 12, 1, 18-28.
24.
Paul S.J., Scharer P.: Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesivebonding systems on dentine. J. Oral Rehabil., 1997, 24, 1, 8-14.
25.
Jung M., Ganss C., Senger S.: Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bondstrength of composite to enamel. Oper. Dent., 1998, 23, 2, 63-68.
26.
Woody T.L., Davis R.D.: The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporarycements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper. Dent., 1992, 17, 5, 175-180.
27.
Rosales-Leal J.I., Osorio R., Toledano M., Cabrerizo-Vilchez M.A., Millstein P.L.:Influence of eugenol contamination on the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper. Dent., 2003, 28, 6, 695-699.
28.
Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacyof dentin-bonding systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 1999, 107, 1, 65-69.
29.
Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2006, 8, 1, 31-34.
30.
Xie J., Powers J.M., McGuckin R.S.: In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel anddentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent. Mater., 1993, 9, 5, 295-299.
31.
Watanabe E.K., Yamashita A., Imai M., Yatani H., Suzuki K.: Temporary cement remnants asan adhesion inhibiting factor in the interface between resin cements and bovine dentin. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1997, 10, 5, 440-452.
32.
Terata R., Nakashima K., Obara M., Kubota M.: Characterization of Enamel and Dentinsurfaces after removal of a temporary cement – effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent. Mater J., 1994, 13, 2, 148-154.
33.
Yap A.U., Shah K.C., Loh E.T., Sim S.S., Tan C.C.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporaryrestorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper. Dent., 2001, 26, 6, 556-561.
34.
Bayindir F., Akyil M.S., Bayindir Y.Z.: Effect of eugenol and noneugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent. Mater J., 2003, 22, 4, 592-599.
35.
Holderegger C., Paul S.J., Luthy H., Scharer P.: Bond strength of one-bottle dentin bondingagents on human dentin. Am. J. Dent., 1997, 10, 2, 71-76.
36.
Meyerowitz J.M., Rosen M., Cohen J., Becker P.J.: The effect of eugenol containing and non-eugenol temporary cements on the resinenamel bond. J. Dent. Assoc. S. Afr., 1994, 49, 8, 389-392.
37.
Watanabe E.K., Yatani H., Ishikawa K., Suzuki K., Yamashita A.: Pilot study of conditioner/primer effects on resin – dentin bonding after provisional cement contaminationusing SEM, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and bond strength evaluation measures. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2000, 83, 3, 349-355.
38.
Grasso C.A., Caluori D.M., Goldstein G.R., Hittelman E.: In vivo evaluation of three cleansingtechniques for prepared abutment teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2002, 88, 4, 437-441.
39.
Ganss C., Jung M.: Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper. Dent., 1998, 23, 2, 55-62.
40.
Hume W.R.: An analysis of the release and the diffusion through dentin of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J. Dent. Res., 1984, 63, 6, 881-884.
41.
Hansen E.K., Asmussen E.: Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin--bonding agents. Scand. J. Dent. Res., Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1987, 95, 6, 516-520.
42.
Terata R., Nakashima K., Kubota M.: Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am. J. Dent., 2000, 13, 4, 209-211.
43.
Kanakuri K., Kawamoto Y., Kakehashi Y., Matsumura H.: Influence of temporary cementson bond strength between resin-based luting agents and dentin. Am. J. Dent., 2006, 19, 2, 101-105.
44.
Coli P., Alaeddin S., Wennerberg A., Karlsson S.: In vitro dentin pretreatment: surface roughness and adhesive shear bond strength. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 1999, 107, 5, 400-413.
45.
Watanabe E.K., Yamashita A., Yatani H., Ishikawa K., Suzuki K.: Improvement in thetensile bond strength between resin cement and dentin surfaces after temporary cement application. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1998, 11, 3, 203-211.
46.
Kanakuri K., Kawamoto Y., Matsumura H.: Influence of temporary cement remnant andsurface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J. Oral Sci., 2005, 47, 1, 9-13.
47.
Schwartz R., Davis R., Hilton T.J.: Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of resincement. Am. J. Dent., 1992, 5, 3, 147-150.
48.
Myers T.D.: Advances in air abrasive technology. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 1994, 22, 9, 41-44.
49.
Hume W.R.: In vitro studies on the local pharmacodynamics, pharmacology and toxicology of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. Int. Endod. J., 1988, 21, 2, 130-134.
50.
Katora M.E., Jubach T., Polimus M.M.: Air abrasive etching of the enamel surface. Quintessence Int. Dent. Dig., 1981, 12, 9, 967-968.
51.
Burnett L.H. Jr, Conceicao E.N., Pelinos J.E., Eduardo C.D.: Comparative study of influenceon tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er-YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg., 2001, 19, 4, 199-202.
52.
Chaves P., Giannini M., Ambrosano G.M.: Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2002, 4, 3, 191-196.
53.
Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Mattar D., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P.: Microtensilebond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper. Dent., 2003, 28, 5, 647-660.
54.
Carvalho C.N., Bauer J.R.O., Loguercio A.D., Reis A.: Effect of ZOE temporary restorationon resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2007, 19, 3, 144-152.
55.
Saraç D., Bulucu B., Saraç Y.S., Kulunk S.: The effect of dentin-cleaning agents on resincement bond strength to dentin. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2008, 139, 6, 751-758.
56.
Jacques P., Hebling J.: Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of aconventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dent. Mater., 2005, 21, 2, 103-109.
57.
Van Meerbeek B., Inokoshi S., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G.: Morphologicalaspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J. Dent. Res., 1992, 71, 8, 1530-1540.
58.
Eick J.D., Gwinnett A.J., Pashley D.H. Robinson S.J.: Current concepts on adhesionto dentin. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 1997, 8, 3, 306-335.
59.
Takimoto M., Ishii R., Iino M., Shimizu Y., Tsujimoto A., Takamizawa T., Ando S., Miyazaki M.: Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J. Dent., 2012, 40, 2, 131-138
60.
Sanabe A.E., Giorgetti A.P.O., Cruz A.R., Hebling J.: Influência da contaminação da dentina por cimentos temporários na resistência da união de sistemas adesivos. RGO – Rev. Gaúcha Odontol., 2009, 57, 1, 33-39.
61.
Macchi R.L., Capurro M.A., Herrera C.L., Cebada F.R., Kohen S.: Influence of endodonticmaterials on the bonding of composite res-in to dentin. Endod. Dent. Traumatol., 1992, 8, 1, 26-29.
62.
Nikaido T., Kataumi M., Burrow M.F., Inokoshi S., Yamada T., Takatsu T.: Bond strength of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Oper. Dent., 1996, 21, 5, 218-224.
63.
Manhart J., Mehl A., Schroeter R., Obster B., Hickel R.: Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion. Oper. Dent., 1999, 24, 4, 223-232.
| eISSN: | 2391-601X |
| ISSN: | 0033-1783 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
