RESEARCH PAPER
Possible reasons for failure of implant treatment with use of stereolithographic surgical templates. Part I: Patient qualification, radiographic guide preparation and computed tomography scanning
1,
1
| 1 | Medical University of Warsaw |
Prosthodontics 2013;63(1):14–21
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES (8)
1.
Rothman S. L., Chaftez N., Rhodes M. L., Schwarz M. S., Schwartz M. S.: CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress. Radiology, 1988, 168, 171-175.
2.
Jacobs R., Adriansens A., Verstreken K., Suetens P., van Steenberghe D.: Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 1999, 28, 105-111.
3.
Basten C. H.: The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int., 1995, 26, 609-612.
4.
Hammerle C. H., Stone P., Jung, R. E., Kapos T. & Brodala N.: Consensus statement and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. Inter. J. Oral and Maxillofac. Impl., 2009, 24, 126- 130.
5.
Jung, R. E., Schneider D., Ganeles J., Wismeijer D., Zwahlen M., Hammerle C. H. & Thmaseb A.: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Inter. J. Oral and Maxillofac. Impl., 2009, 24, 92-109.
6.
Schneider D., Marquardt P., Zwahlen M., Jung R. E.: A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2009, 20 (Suppl 4), 73-86.
7.
Van Assche N., van Steenberghe D., Guerrero M. E., et al.: Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2007, 34, 816-821.
8.
Widmann G., Bale R. J.: Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery – a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2006, 21, 305-313.
RELATED ARTICLE
