RESEARCH PAPER
Possible reasons for failure of implant treatment with the use of stereolithographic surgical templates. Part III. Surgical stage and recapitulation
 
More details
Hide details
 
Prosthodontics 2013;63(3):177–191
 
 
REFERENCES (10)
1.
Di Giacomo G. A. P., Cury P., De Araujo N. S., Sendyk W. R., Sendyk C. L.: Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J. Periodontol., 2005, 76, 503-507.
 
2.
Ewers R., Schicho K., Undt G., Wanschitz F.,Truppe M., Seemann R., Wagner A.: Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int. J. Oral and Maxillofac. Surg., 2005, 34, 1-8.
 
3.
Fortin T., Champleboux G., Bianchi S., Buatois H., Coudert J.: Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on Cone-Beam-CT scan images through a robotic drilling machine – an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2002, 13, 651-656.
 
4.
Łomżyński Ł., Mierzwińska-Nastalska E., Bączkowski B.: Diagnostyka i planowanie leczenia implantoprotetycznego z wykorzystaniem specjalistycznego oprogramowania do trójwymiarowej wizualizacji tkanek – zalety oraz ograniczenia systemu. Część II: Ograniczenia systemu – na podstawie do- świadczeń własnych. Protet. Stomatol., 2008, LVIII, 2, 247-251.
 
5.
Horwitz J., Zuabi O., Machtei E. E.: Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2009, 000– 000. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x.
 
6.
Van Assche N., van Steenberghe D., Guerrero M. E., Hirsch E., Schutyser F., Quirynen M., Jacobs R.: Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three– dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2007, 34, 816-821.
 
7.
Ruppin J., Popovic A., Strauss M., Spuntrup E., Steiner A., Stoll C.: Evaluation of accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology:optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01430.x.
 
8.
Kraemer F. J., Baethge C., Swennen G., Rosahl S.: Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2005, 16, 60-68.
 
9.
Hoffmann J., Westendorff C., Gomez-Roman G., Reinert S.: Accuracy of navigation – guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2005,16, 609- 614.
 
10.
Vercruyssen M., Jacobs R., Van Assche N., van Steenberghe D.:The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J. Oral Rehabil., 2008, 35, 6, 454-474.
 
eISSN:2391-601X
ISSN:0033-1783