PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Methods of assessing stability of dental implants. A literature review. Part I. Invasive methods
 
More details
Hide details
1
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań
 
2
Poznań University of Medical Sciences
 
 
Prosthodontics 2014;64(5):361-368
 
KEYWORDS
 
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Albrektsson T., Branåemark P.I., Hansson H.A., Lindström J.: Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1981, 52, 155-170.
 
2.
Schroeder A., van der Zypen E., Stich H., Sutter F.: The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J. Maxillofac. Surg., 1981, 9, 15-25.
 
3.
Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T.: Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2009, 20, 172-184.
 
4.
Morawiec T., Srebrzyńska A., Krywult A., Koszowski R.: Metody określania stabilizacji wszczepów zębowych. Przegląd piśmiennictwa. Mag. Stomatol., 2008, 9, 82- 86.
 
5.
Stout S.D.: Histomorphometric Analysis of Human Skeletal Remains. w: Iscan MY, Kennedy KAR (ed.). Reconstruction of Life From the Skeleton, Willey-Liss, 1989, 41-52.
 
6.
Chai W.L., Moharamzadeh K., Brook I.M., Van Noort R.: A review of histomorphometric analysis techniques for assessing implant-soft tissue interface. Biotech. Histochem., 2011, 86, 242-254.
 
7.
Wennerberg A., Hallgren C., Johansson C., Danelli S.: A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1998, 9, 11-19.
 
8.
Ahn S.J., Leesungbok R., Lee S.W.: Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs. J. Oral Implantol., 2010, 36, 263-272.
 
9.
Hermann J.S., Buser D., Schenk R.K., Schoolfield J.D., Cochran D.L.: Biologic Width around one– and two-piece titanium implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2001, 12, 559-571.
 
10.
Berglundh T., Lindhe J., Jonsson K., Ericsson I.: The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J. Clin. Periodontol., 1994, 21, 189-193.
 
11.
Sauberlich S., Klee D., Richter E.J., Hocker H., Spiekermann H.: Cell culture tests for assessing the tolerance of soft tissue to variously modified titanium surfaces. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1999, 10, 379-393.
 
12.
Lauer G., Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M., Otten J.E., Hubner U., Schmelzeisen R., Schilli W.: The titanium surface texture effects adherence and growth of human gingival keratinocytes and human maxillar osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials, 2001, 22, 2799-2809.
 
13.
Pendegrass C.J., Gordon D., Middleton C.A., Sun S.N., Blunn G.W.: Sealing the skin barrier around transcutaneous implants: In vitro study of keratinocyte proliferation and adhesion in response to surface modifications of titanium alloy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2008, 90, 114-121.
 
14.
Johansson P., Strid K.: Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1994, 9, 279-288.
 
15.
Friberg B., Sennerby L., Roos J., Johansson P., Strid C.G., Lekholm U.: Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1995, 6, 164-171.
 
16.
Friberg B., Sennerby L., Meredith N., Lekholm U.: A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 1999, 28, 297-303.
 
17.
Atsumi M., Park S.H., Wang H.L.: Methods Used to Assess Implant Stability: Current Status. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2007, 22, 743-754.
 
18.
Turkyilmaz I., Tumer C., Ozbek E.N., Tözüm T.F.: Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2007, 34, 716-722.
 
19.
Turkyilmaz I., Sennerby L., McGlumphy E.A., Tözüm T.F.: Biomechanical Aspects of Primary Implant Stability: A Human Cadaver Study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2009, 11, 113-119.
 
20.
Trisi P., De Benedittis S., Perfetti G., Berardi D.: Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2011, 22, 567- 570.
 
21.
Song Y.Y., Cha J.Y., Hwang C.J.: Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic miniscrews in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. Angle Orthod., 2007, 77, 979-985.
 
22.
Irinakis T., Wiebe C.: Initial torque stability of a new bone condensing dental implant. A cohort study of 140 consecutively placed implants. J. Oral Implantol., 2009, 35, 277-282.
 
23.
Alsaadi G., Quirynen M., Michiels K., Jacobs R., van Steenberghe D.: A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment. J. Clin Periodontol., 2007, 34, 359-366.
 
24.
Lim S.A., Cha J.Y., Hwang C.J.: Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. Angle Orthod., 2008, 78, 234-240.
 
25.
Chaddad K., Ferreira A.F., Geurs N., Reddy M.S.: Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod., 2008, 78, 107-113.
 
26.
Ottoni J.M., Oliveira Z.F., Mansini R., Cabral A.M.: Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 2005, 20, 769- 776.
 
27.
Warreth A., Polyzois I., Lee C.T., Claffey N.: Generation of microdamage around endosseous implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2009, 20, 1300-1306.
 
28.
Burr D.B.: Targeted and nontargeted remodeling. Bone, 2002, 30, 2-4.
 
29.
Duyck J., Corpas L., Vermeiren S., Ogawa T., Quirynen M., Vandamme K., Jacobs R., Naert I.: Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 2010, 21, 877-884.
 
30.
Scarano A., Piattelli A., Assenza B., Sollazzo V., Lucchese A., Carinci F.: Assessment of pain associated with insertion torque of dental implants. A prospective, randomizedcontrolled study. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol., 2011, 24, 65-69.
 
31.
Gotfredsen K., Nimb L., Hjörting-Hansen E., Jensen J.S., Holmén A.: Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin. Oral Implants. Res., 1992, 3, 77- 84.
 
32.
Wennerberg A., Ektessabi A., Albrektsson T., Johansson C., Andersson B.: A 1-Year followup of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1997, 12, 486-494.
 
33.
Taché A., Gan L., Deporter D., Pilliar R.M.: Effect of surface chemistry on the rate of osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2004, 19, 19-29.
 
34.
Sul Y.T., Johansson C.B., Albrektsson T.: Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2002, 17, 625-634.
 
35.
Sul Y.T., Johansson C., Wennerberg A., Cho L.R., Chang B.S., Albrektsson T.: Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness and crystal structure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2005, 20, 349-359.
 
36.
Klokkevold P.R., Nishimura R.D., Adachi M., Caputo A.: Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin. Oral Implants. Res., 1997, 8, 442-447.
 
37.
Sennerby L., Thomsen P., Ericson L.E.: A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1992, 7, 62-71.
 
38.
Sullivan D.Y., Sherwood R.L., Collins T.A., Krogh P.H.: The Reverse-torque test: A clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1996, 11, 179-185.
 
39.
Brånemark R., Ohrnell L.O., Skalak R., Carlsson L., Brånemark P.I.: Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J. Orthop. Res., 1998, 16, 61-69.
 
40.
Weinberg L.A.: The Biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1993 8, 19- 31.
 
41.
Brunski J.B., Puleo D.A., Nanci A.: Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2000, 15, 15-46. 42. Oliscovicz N.F., Shimano A.C., Marcantonio Junior E., Lepri C.P., Dos Reis A.C.: Analysis of primary stability of dental implants inserted in different substrates using the pullout test and insertion torque. Int. J. Dent., 2013, 20, 194-198. 43 Thorey F., Menzel H., Lorenz C., Gross G., Hoffmann A., Windhagen H.: Osseointegration by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor beta2 coated titanium implants in femora of New Zealand white rabbits. Indian J. Orthop., 2011, 45, 57-62. 44 Tsai W.C., Chen P.Q., Lu T.W., Wu S.S., Shih K.S., Lin S.C.: Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 2009, 30, 10-44. 45 Abshire B.B., McLain R.F., Valdevit A., Kambic H.E.: Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out. Spine J. 2001, 1, 408-414. 46 Chapman J.R., Harrington R.M., Lee K.M., Anderson P.A., Tencer A.F., Kowalski D.: Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J. Biomech. Eng., 1996, 118, 391-398. 47 Lewis A.F., Jordan J.R., Parsell D.E., Kosko M.: Comparison of pullout strength of resorbable screws in human cadaveric laryngeal cartilage using different drill diameters. Head Neck, 2008, 30, 1464-1468. 48 Wu J.H., Wang H.C., Chen C.M., Lu P.C., Lai S.T., Lee K.T., Du J.K.: Pullout strengths of orthodontic palatal mini-implants tested in vitro. J. Dent. Sci., 2011, 6, 200-204.
 
eISSN:2391-601X
ISSN:0033-1783
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top